On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Don Lewis <truckman_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >>> What am I overlooking? >> >> Create a large, but nearly empty file system, /a > ^ > memory/swap based > >> Mount a file system backed by a physical disk on /a/b >> Create the file /a/b/c and configure it to be used as swap >> Write a large amount of data to the file /a/d, which will overflow RAM >> and be paged out to /a/b/c >> >> It won't be possible to disable swapping to /a/b/c because there is not >> sufficient RAM to page in the data stored there. It won't be possible >> to unmount /a/b because /a/b/c is busy. It won't be possible to unmount >> /a because it is busy because /a/b is mounted on it. > > Ah! Yes! I tend to forget this is possible. In my mind a memory/swap based FS > as a "leaf" in the directory tree... or more correctly, the subtree below the > memory/swap based FS isn't allowed to contain a mointpoint of a non > memory/swap based FS. Any other use which may require to break this rule has > to use symlinks instead and isn't allowed to break the rule. > > This helps to avoid some pitfalls. > >> If the dependencies are tracked so that this configuration (swapping to >> anything that is directly or indirectly dependent on a swap-backed file >> system) can be forbidden, then either the algorithm that I suggested, or > > I'm not sure if we should enforce this policy... I like it, but I think such > a restriction should be configurable via sysctl (enabled by default). > >> your iterative algorithm should work. Your algorithm could even be >> simplified by pulling the swap-off out of the loop. >> >> unconfigure md's that are not busy >> do { >> foreach filesystem in reverse(mountlist) { >> unmount filesystem >> if (success and backed by md) >> unconfigure md /* either swap or vnode backed */ >> } >> } while (progress) >> swap-off >> do { >> foreach filesystem in reverse(mountlist) { >> unmount filesystem >> if (success and backed by md) >> unconfigure md /* only vnode backed remain */ >> } >> } while (progress) >> >> Removing the swap-off from the loop may avoid a lot of paging activity >> because all the paged-out data from swap backed md's will be discarded >> before swap is disabled. > > Sounds even better. I will try to produce patches tonight for this. Stay tuned! Cheers! Andy /* Andre Guibert de Bruet * 6f43 6564 7020 656f 2e74 4220 7469 6a20 */ /* Code poet / Sysadmin * 636f 656b 2e79 5320 7379 6461 696d 2e6e */ /* GSM: +1 734 846 8758 * 5520 494e 2058 6c73 7565 6874 002e 0000 */ /* WWW: siliconlandmark.com * Tormenting bytes since 1980. */Received on Thu Jun 02 2005 - 12:04:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:35 UTC