Hi, >>> On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:44:03 +0900 >>> Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume_at_mahoroba.org> said: ume> I've attached the patch to correct 1st argument of getnetbyaddr(3) in ume> this mail. It is subset of my previous patch. Since it breaks ABI ume> compatibility of getnetbyaddr(3), I think it is better to correct ume> n_net member of struct netent, too. Since there is objection, the ume> patch leaves struct addrinfo as is. So, it doesn't need to bump any ume> shlib major. Is it okay? Ultimately, I wish to correct struct addrinfo, too. Since correcting getnetbyaddr(3) breaks ABI compatibility after all, it seems storange to me to leave struct addrinfo alone as is. It is better to take this occasion to correct struct addrinfo as well. This breakage is only on 64 bit arch. The influence will grow as 64 bit arch spreads. So, I believe it should be done as soon as possible. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO _at_ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume_at_mahoroba.org ume_at_{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/Received on Thu Jun 02 2005 - 17:20:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:35 UTC