Re: glxgears

From: Scott Robbins <scottro_at_nyc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:40:23 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 08:29:34PM +0000, Craig Kleski wrote:
> After moving from -stable to -current recently, I noticed that glxgears 
> is more than 50% faster in -current.  My kernel options have not 
> changed, and it's not dri (i915 doesn't work yet).  Has anyone else 
> noticed a similar speed increases in X?  Any idea why?    


VERY VERY subjective answer, yes, CURRENT seems snappier as has been
said before.  (I was using ULE and PREEMPTION in 5.4)

(However, I have some cheap onboard video card, using the via driver).
Things like frozen bubble for instance, just seem snappier, even on this
low-end machine, 1.2 gig processor 512 megs DDR vs my main 5.4
workstation, 3 gig processor, a gig of DDR.  


Again, very subjective--both machines are lightly loaded, really just
workstations. 


- -- 

Scott Robbins

PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

Buffy: You're like my fairy godmother, and Santa Claus, and Q 
all wrapped up into one. (they look at her) Q from Bond, not 
Star Trek. 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCn6b3+lTVdes0Z9YRArN/AJ0dDeHgRipr/wnW61X4nZXOwlYXqQCfbrFN
ychAKoi7SIEeS1QH5kTul5Y=
=or/D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thu Jun 02 2005 - 22:40:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:35 UTC