Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy_at_gmail.com> writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no> writes: > > It also seems strange to me that you on the one hand introduce a > > new struct to separate MD and MI interfaces, and on the other hand > > continue to assume that they are assignment-compatible. > I'd be very surprised if two C structures with identical definitions > were not assignment compatible. I wouldn't be surprised if the standard says they aren't. Unfortunately, my copy is at home. > The code in question would have > changed (to something like what it is now) had the MD struct changed > in the future. Of course, but you wouldn't be able to run an old userland on a new kernel. I thought that was (much of) the point of separating MI from MD. Please fix your MUA to attribute what it quotes. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.noReceived on Fri Jun 10 2005 - 07:06:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC