Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all...

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:49:22 -0400
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 07:21:05PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:47:06AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:32:14AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > > Ruslan Ermilov <ru_at_FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > > And if you feel that -fno-strict-aliasing is evil, why not dike it
> > > > out from sys.mk?
> > > 
> > > 'ncvs annotate /usr/src/share/mk/sys/mk | grep aliasing' and you'll
> > > realize that any attempt to touch it would result in a huge flamewar.
> > > 
> > I don't see a flamewar, only the mention that it breaks some notable
> > ports.  If it's not suitable for ports, then we should invent a mean
> > to compile only src/ *without* -fno-strict-aliasing.
> 
> I tried.  But Kris refused to consider the following for committing.
> The problem is something like 3 ports will not build with
> "-fno-strict-aliasing".  Those are the gcc28, gnat[*] ports.

No, I was waiting for you to provide the patch that has zero net
damage, i.e. which fixes those 3 ports and leaves nothing broken for
someone else to clean up.

Kris
Received on Sun Jun 12 2005 - 00:49:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC