On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 07:21:05PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:47:06AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:32:14AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > Ruslan Ermilov <ru_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > > And if you feel that -fno-strict-aliasing is evil, why not dike it > > > > out from sys.mk? > > > > > > 'ncvs annotate /usr/src/share/mk/sys/mk | grep aliasing' and you'll > > > realize that any attempt to touch it would result in a huge flamewar. > > > > > I don't see a flamewar, only the mention that it breaks some notable > > ports. If it's not suitable for ports, then we should invent a mean > > to compile only src/ *without* -fno-strict-aliasing. > > I tried. But Kris refused to consider the following for committing. > The problem is something like 3 ports will not build with > "-fno-strict-aliasing". Those are the gcc28, gnat[*] ports. No, I was waiting for you to provide the patch that has zero net damage, i.e. which fixes those 3 ports and leaves nothing broken for someone else to clean up. Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC