Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all...

From: Mark Linimon <linimon_at_lonesome.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:24:06 -0500
> I tried.  But Kris refused to consider the following for committing.
> The problem is something like 3 ports will not build with
> "-fno-strict-aliasing".  Those are the gcc28, gnat[*] ports.
> 
> [*] I really don't understand why we have a GCC 2.8 based Ada compiler
> when Ada has been a native part of GCC since version 3.1...

If these ports are useless, why don't we mark them DEPRECATED and
after a decent interval, get rid of them?

In this day and age, anyone who's on gcc27 or gcc28 is hopelessly
behind anyways.  I can't imagine that with the long-established
track record of gcc295 there is any reason to keep them.

mcl
Received on Sun Jun 12 2005 - 02:24:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC