This is on 4.x, but I'm posting to current, it's likely also an issue on current. Posting here hoping someone can shed more info on this lockmgr race. I've into a bug where process 1 successfully LK_UPGRADEs a vnode lock (from shared to excl) and process 2 successfully acquires the shared lock on that same vnode. I am not sure what order the locks were acquired, it's not possible to infer that from the core. Does this bug ring a bell with anyone ? If it does, can they shed any light/info they might have on this ? thanks mohanReceived on Wed Jun 15 2005 - 22:41:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC