On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 20:41, Mohan Srinivasan wrote: > This is on 4.x, but I'm posting to current, it's likely also > an issue on current. Posting here hoping someone can shed > more info on this lockmgr race. > > I've into a bug where process 1 successfully LK_UPGRADEs a > vnode lock (from shared to excl) and process 2 successfully > acquires the shared lock on that same vnode. I am not sure > what order the locks were acquired, it's not possible to > infer that from the core. > > Does this bug ring a bell with anyone ? If it does, can they > shed any light/info they might have on this ? > > thanks > > mohan Reminds me of: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/69934 StephanReceived on Wed Jun 15 2005 - 23:50:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC