On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Ed Maste wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:36:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > Do you understand the fix? How does lying in printheader() fix anything? > > Moving the call to getbounds() back to the original location is the "fix" > > but then it negates -vv. We shouldn't lie in printheader(). > > Fair enough, on dwhite's suggestion here's another try that splits the > increment-and-write out from getbounds() so that the bounds value can > be shown with -vv. Looks good to me, although I won't pass any verdict on style(9)isms. :) -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite_at_gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Thu Jun 16 2005 - 17:12:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC