On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:36:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > Do you understand the fix? How does lying in printheader() fix anything? > Moving the call to getbounds() back to the original location is the "fix" > but then it negates -vv. We shouldn't lie in printheader(). Fair enough, on dwhite's suggestion here's another try that splits the increment-and-write out from getbounds() so that the bounds value can be shown with -vv. -- Ed Maste, Sandvine Incorporated
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC