On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Eric Anderson wrote: >> Interestingly, there's been a bunch of reports of this in the past few >> days, and there weren't immediately after the malloc commit. I wonder if >> some other recent change has increased the amount of UMA memory allocated >> early in the boot, increasing the level of reports... > > Increase UMA_BOOT_PAGES to prevent a crash during initialization. See > http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42AD8270.8060906 for a detailed > description of the crash. Yeah, this is the fix, but I guess I'm wondering what caused a recent spate of problem reports -- was it a delayed response to the malloc change as people gradually upgraded, or some other recent kernel change that caused increase demand for memory. Robert N M WatsonReceived on Fri Jun 17 2005 - 09:38:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC