Re: devd

From: Richard Coleman <rcoleman_at_criticalmagic.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:17:01 -0400

M. Warner Losh wrote:
> devd won't be rewritten to not use C++.  That's a non-option.
> 
> Warner

Out of curiosity, why is that?  I have nothing against C++, but that 
stance seems surprising.  I have not scanned the tree, but I was under 
the impression that very little of the base system that is written in C++.

Richard Coleman
rcoleman_at_criticalmagic.com

Received on Mon Jun 20 2005 - 22:15:29 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: M. Warner Losh: "Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a Soekris 4801"
Previous message: Paul Querna: "Re: Panic with nve"
In reply to: M. Warner Losh: "Re: dhclient less functional with nanobsd because of NO_CXX"
Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: devd"
Reply: M. Warner Losh: "Re: devd"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC