Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a Soekris 4801

From: Garrett Wollman <wollman_at_csail.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:02:49 -0400
<<On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:58:46 +0100 (BST), Robert Watson <rwatson_at_FreeBSD.ORG> said:

> - Providing more complete NO_xxx functionality, identifying more
>    components that can easily be frobbed.  I.e., I have local patches for
>    NO_ACL and NO_MAC that remove small but useful functional subsets that I
>    may get a chance to commit for 6.0, or may not.

We should, at a minimum, look at the POSIX options and profiling
support.  Many of these issues have been considered by other groups
before, so let's not reinvent the wheel until and unless we have
measured the previous attempts and found pi equal to 2.818.

-GAWollman
Received on Mon Jun 20 2005 - 14:02:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC