Re: panic: Memory modified after free

From: Mike Silbersack <silby_at_silby.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:05:44 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Andrey Chernov wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 03:29:42AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>>
>> Andrey, the use after free panic you reported sounds like it could be a
>> use after free of a mbuf.  What network interfaces do you have on your
>> system, and what features are you using?  (ipfw, netgraph, etc.)
>
> No ipfw, netgraph or anything complex.
>
> de0: flags=108843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>        inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>        inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>        ether 00:00:c0:f1:ef:d3
>        media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP
>        status: active

Ok, I'm going to spend a few minutes doing an inspection of if_de.c to see 
if I can find anything odd.

Can anyone else with a de card confirm that whether their system now 
elicits similar panics or whether it's all good?

Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Received on Fri Jun 24 2005 - 18:06:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC