Re: unionfs 5.4

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:19:03 +0000
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 04:49:07PM +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:
> >>>>> "Mathieu" == Mathieu Arnold <mat_at_mat.cc> writes:
> 
>  Mathieu> I'm not answering to your question, but what's the need of a
>  Mathieu> ro unionfs, a ro nullfs would do the same, no ?
> 
> It seems that nullfs much slower.

But it works, and doesn't panic the system.  unionfs is
well-documented to be broken, and this is unlikely to change in the
near future.

Kris
Received on Sat Mar 05 2005 - 14:19:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:29 UTC