>>>>> "Kris" == Kris Kennaway <kris_at_FreeBSD.ORG> writes: Kris> But it works, and doesn't panic the system. unionfs is Kris> well-documented to be broken, and this is unlikely to change in Kris> the near future. That's a recent regression, unionfs works fine on FreeBSD sagitta.internal.vlink.ru 6.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Dec 1 17:39:09 MSK 2004 dsh_at_rigel.internal.vlink.ru:/var/FreeBSD/obj/var/FreeBSD/src/sys/SAGITTA i386 And if unionfs panic the system on 5.4 too, I think it can't be STABLE at all. BTW, from man mount_nullfs: BUGS THIS FILE SYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT DOESN'T WORK) AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT, DESTROY DATA ON YOUR SYSTEM. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. BEWARE OF DOG. SLIPPERY WHEN WET. So you can't suggest to use nullfs instead of unionfs, because "is well-documented to be broken". -- DSS5-RIPE DSS-RIPN 2:550/5068_at_fidonet 2:550/5069_at_fidonet mailto:dsh_at_vlink.ru http://neva.vlink.ru/~dsh/Received on Sun Mar 06 2005 - 07:32:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:29 UTC