Re: unionfs 5.4

From: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh_at_vneva.link.ru.vlink.ru>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:39:21 +0300

>>>>> "Mathieu" == Mathieu Arnold <mat_at_mat.cc> writes:

 Mathieu> Well, nullfs and unionfs have the same BUGS section :-)
 Mathieu> OTOH, nullfs has never panic'ed me, whereas unionfs has.

Possible, but I can't use it for jail's system because it very slow.

-- 
DSS5-RIPE DSS-RIPN 2:550/5068_at_fidonet 2:550/5069_at_fidonet
mailto:dsh_at_vlink.ru http://neva.vlink.ru/~dsh/

Received on Sun Mar 06 2005 - 07:39:23 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ari Suutari: "Cannot boot 5.3, 5.3-stable or -current on fujitsu-siemens amilo laptop"
Previous message: Denis Shaposhnikov: "Re: unionfs 5.4"
In reply to: Mathieu Arnold: "Re: unionfs 5.4"
Next in thread: Denis Shaposhnikov: "Re: unionfs 5.4"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:29 UTC