Re: unionfs 5.4

Mathieu Arnold wrote:

> +-le 06/03/2005 11:49 +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov écrivait :
> |>>>>> "Mathieu" == Mathieu Arnold <mat_at_mat.cc> writes:
> | 
> |  Mathieu> Well, nullfs and unionfs have the same BUGS section :-)
> |  Mathieu> OTOH, nullfs has never panic'ed me, whereas unionfs has.
> | Possible, but I can't use it for jail's system because it very slow.
> 
> I find that pretty strange, I'll be thinking that it should be at least as
> fast, if not faster, I'll make some tests this week.
> 

I'd like to add 'me too' note.
I've found nullfs toooo slow in jail.

-- 
Sem.