On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 21:54 -0800, Sam Leffler wrote: > If you''re an ath user on current it'd be great to get John some > feedback on his rate control algorithm as it might be made the default. > I've not tested it with 5210 or 5211 cards and it's likely to have > some issues with them so beware. To use it be sure you have up to date > code and then specify > > device ath_rate_sample > > instead of the normal ath_rate_onoe. > > Sam > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/modules Makefile src/sys/conf files > src/sys/dev/ath/ath_rate/sample sample.c sample.h > src/sys/modules/ath_rate_sample Makefile src/sys/i386/conf NOTES > Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:39:57 +0000 (UTC) > From: Sam Leffler <sam_at_FreeBSD.org> > To: src-committers_at_FreeBSD.org, cvs-src_at_FreeBSD.org, cvs-all_at_FreeBSD.org > > sam 2005-03-11 01:39:57 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/modules Makefile > sys/conf files > sys/i386/conf NOTES > Added files: > sys/dev/ath/ath_rate/sample sample.c sample.h > sys/modules/ath_rate_sample Makefile > Log: > SampleRate rate control algorithm for the ath driver > > Submitted by: John Bicket > > Revision Changes Path > 1.1003 +1 -0 src/sys/conf/files > http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/sys/conf/files.diff?r1=1.1002&r2=1.1003 > 1.1 +608 -0 src/sys/dev/ath/ath_rate/sample/sample.c (new) > http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/sys/dev/ath/ath_rate/sample/sample.c?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > 1.1 +136 -0 src/sys/dev/ath/ath_rate/sample/sample.h (new) > http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/sys/dev/ath/ath_rate/sample/sample.h?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > 1.1188 +1 -0 src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES > http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES.diff?r1=1.1187&r2=1.1188 > 1.430 +1 -0 src/sys/modules/Makefile > http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/sys/modules/Makefile.diff?r1=1.429&r2=1.430 > 1.1 +48 -0 src/sys/modules/ath_rate_sample/Makefile (new) > http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/sys/modules/ath_rate_sample/Makefile?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" After cvsup'ing the fix, module builds and loads properly but fails to associate. I have turned debug flood gates (80211debug 0xffffffff) and it seems to indicate that card is busy scanning the neighborhood. My situation is somewhat complicated by the fact that I have other AP with the stronger signal level nearby: sunny:RabbitsDen>wicontrol ath0 -l 2 stations: ap[0]: netname (SSID): [ YYYYYYYYYYY ] BSSID: [ 00:12:xx:xx:xx:xx ] Channel: [ 6 ] Quality/Signal/Noise [signal]: [ 0 / 21 / 0 ] [dBm]: [ 0 / -128 / -149 ] BSS Beacon Interval [msec]: [ 100 ] Capinfo: [ ESS ] ap[1]: netname (SSID): [ XXXXXXXXXXXX ] BSSID: [ 00:11:xx:xx:xx:xx ] Channel: [ 11 ] Quality/Signal/Noise [signal]: [ 0 / 18 / 0 ] [dBm]: [ 0 / -131 / -149 ] BSS Beacon Interval [msec]: [ 100 ] Capinfo: [ ESS WEP ] AP with SSID "XXXXXXXXXX" (00:11:xx:xx:xx:xx) is the one I am trying to associate with. I have attached debug output -- if more (or less ;) information is needed, please, let me know. Both _onoe and _amrr survive this setup occasionally taking link down and then back up. System is -CURRENT cvsup'ed after the "unresolved reference" fix today and card is PCMCIA Linksys WPC55AG (AR5212). -- Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko (Олександр Коваленко)Received on Fri Mar 11 2005 - 20:27:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:29 UTC