Re: md (file backed) performance [Was: Re: unionfs 5.4]

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 02:51:01 +0000
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:03:05AM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:

> > I can't MFC this for 5.4, it requires too much of the new vfs architecture
> > to properly function.  I'll mail re_at_ to see what their opinion is for 5.5.
> 
> Oic. I haven't tracked -current since christmas so I'd like to ask if you know 
> anything new about file backed md performance.
> I wanted to use that for jail systems but performance was really bad.
> Does your great work also improve md behaviour?

A few months ago alc made some commits which improved md performance
significantly.

Kris

--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe_at_alum.mit.edu>
Received on Thu Mar 17 2005 - 01:51:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:30 UTC