Re: unionfs 5.4

From: Emanuel Strobl <emanuel.strobl_at_gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:52:54 +0200
Am Donnerstag, 17. März 2005 02:24 schrieb Jeff Roberson:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 16. März 2005 07:16 schrieb Sergey Matveychuk:
> > > Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > > >>just ffs: 1:47 min
> > > >>nullfs:   1:43 min (oops!:)
> > > >>nullfs in jail: 12:12 min
> > > >>
> > > >>Almost ten times degradation.
> > > >
> > > > Can you try this again on current?  I just committed some changes to
> > > > nullfs which vastly simplify the locking.  I don't see anything
> > > > inherent in the code that should cause such a slowdown.
> > >
> > > The problem has gone. Thanks Jeff!
> > > Don't forget MFC it some time :)
> >
> > Highly appreciated for 5.4!!!
>
> I can't MFC this for 5.4, it requires too much of the new vfs architecture
> to properly function.  I'll mail re_at_ to see what their opinion is for 5.5.

I hope you don't mind if I ask about the chance to get your great work MFCd to 
RELENG_5 in the very near future, now that RELENG_5_4 is branched.

Thanks,

-Harry


>
> > Thanks a lot,
> >
> > -Harry
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"

Received on Mon Apr 04 2005 - 18:53:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:31 UTC