On 4/4/2005, "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >In message <1112632713.71324.52.camel_at_buffy.york.ac.uk>, Gavin Atkinson writes: > >>Only the most anti-gun people would say that the safety catch should >>We're not talking about curb-side child-height baskets. We're talking >>about people who should know what they are doing (they have root, after >>all), entering commands which they expect to work... > >Sorry, I disagree. > >This was true when root was Ken, Dennis and Brian. > >Today root is Tom, Dick and Harry and they need sensible padding. On Linux, I would agree. Every 16 year-old h4x0r in the northern hemisphere picks up Linux and expects it to be idiotproof. On BSD, I disagree. Frankly, I feel BSD operators are BSD operators because they _want_ the power available, not because it's the new fad OS on the block. The audience is more mature, and should be treated as asuch. Honestly, I think most BSD operators expect the power of root to be undiluted, the arguments put forth thus far should be proof enough of that. And if a BSD operator shoots their own foot off, they remember not to do "that" again without reading the manual and testing in a non-production environment first. Just my $0.02 on the matter. -ReidReceived on Mon Apr 04 2005 - 17:46:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:31 UTC