On Sat 30 Apr 05 16:52, Michael Nottebrock <lofi_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On Saturday, 30. April 2005 13:26, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > > Personally, I'd *love* to be able to install KMail without having > > to install kdebase and kdelibs, > > just kdelibs, in fact Really? Well, never tried that ... but I do use other parts of KDE, so not sure how practical it would be to not have the base. Also, I do like Konqueror as a file manager. > > not to mention the rest of kdepim, but > > trying to convince the KDE project to uncouple it from the rest of > > the project is rather like tilting at windmills. > > It's important to keep in mind that such a KMail would be a different > program than it is today, with a different (considerably smaller) > feature set. Well, getting deep into bikeshed territory here, but, yeah, I know. At first this used to frustrate me, but I've also found that other parts of kdepim are useful to me, and I like having the integration (KGpg in particular is a big help when using with KMail, and I've come to like KOrganizer, as it integrates with my address book and KMail), but I don't usually run KDE as a desktop, as it's more than I need. Also, it's nice to be able to install other parts of KDE if I find the need. I run xfce4 with parts of KDE and Gnome, and my favorite terminal emulator is Eterm (it's so fast), though the full Enlightenment is cool but not my thing, and I never did like Gnome as a desktop. Sorta piecemeal, but it works for me. I'm just glad disk space is cheap these days ;) - jtReceived on Sun May 01 2005 - 01:28:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:33 UTC