Hi, >>>>> On Tue, 31 May 2005 08:48:32 -0600 (MDT) >>>>> "M. Warner Losh" <imp_at_bsdimp.com> said: imp> In general, yes. However, I think that only those libraries that use imp> the affected interfaces in libc need a bump in this case. Maybe we imp> should look to see which libraries are affected rather than a blind imp> bump. No, it is not blind bump. The following libraries refers getaddrinfo(3), thus should be bumped: RELENG_5 HEAD Need to Bump libbsnmp 2 2 o libc 5 6 libfetch 3 3 o libftpio 5 5 o libipsec 1 1 o libkadm5clnt 7 7 o libkrb5 7 7 o libpam 2 2 pam_radius o pam_unix o libpcap 3 3 o libroken 7 7 o libssh 2 2 o libutil 4 4 o libwrap 3 3 o Actually, not all libraries of kerberos and pam stuff refer getaddrinfo(3). However, it seems shlib major of kerberos and pam stuff are managed by single major version. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO _at_ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume_at_mahoroba.org ume_at_{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/Received on Tue May 31 2005 - 13:06:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:35 UTC