On Tue, 31 May 2005, [iso-8859-1] Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume_at_freebsd.org> writes: > > No, it is not blind bump. The following libraries refers > > getaddrinfo(3), thus should be bumped: > > > > RELENG_5 HEAD Need to Bump > > [...] > > libpam 2 2 > > pam_radius o > > pam_unix o > > You can't just bump libpam; you need to bump all the modules along > with it, because libpam will only load modules with the same major > number as itself. In fact, there is only a single SHLIB_MAJOR for the > entire src/lib/libpam tree, in src/lib/libpam/Makefile.inc. > > Is it really necessary to remove the padding? It gives us a lot of > trouble for zero gain. And sometimes we put padding in place to allow for expansion (ucontext for one). I think the padding should stay. If we ever get symbol versioning, then you can remove it without having to bump library versions. -- DEReceived on Tue May 31 2005 - 14:51:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:35 UTC