Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume_at_freebsd.org> writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no> writes: > > You can't just bump libpam; you need to bump all the modules along > > with it, because libpam will only load modules with the same major > > number as itself. In fact, there is only a single SHLIB_MAJOR for the > > entire src/lib/libpam tree, in src/lib/libpam/Makefile.inc. > Thank you for clarification. My patch bumps SHLIB_MAJOR in > lib/libpam/Makefile.inc. As PAM maintainer, I strongly object. > > Is it really necessary to remove the padding? It gives us a lot of > > trouble for zero gain. > I think such cleanup should be done before major release. What do we gain from removing the padding? Is there even a single practical benefit to doing so? DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.noReceived on Tue May 31 2005 - 14:57:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:35 UTC