Re: [CFR] correct type of addrinfo.ai_addrlen and netent.n_net

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:57:09 +0200
Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume_at_freebsd.org> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no> writes:
> > You can't just bump libpam; you need to bump all the modules along
> > with it, because libpam will only load modules with the same major
> > number as itself.  In fact, there is only a single SHLIB_MAJOR for the
> > entire src/lib/libpam tree, in src/lib/libpam/Makefile.inc.
> Thank you for clarification.  My patch bumps SHLIB_MAJOR in
> lib/libpam/Makefile.inc.

As PAM maintainer, I strongly object.

> > Is it really necessary to remove the padding?  It gives us a lot of
> > trouble for zero gain.
> I think such cleanup should be done before major release.

What do we gain from removing the padding?  Is there even a single
practical benefit to doing so?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no
Received on Tue May 31 2005 - 14:57:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:35 UTC