On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Max Laier wrote: >> >> Here it is: right before panic it prints >> >> For 0xffffff0017531100 -1 ticks >> For 0xffffff0017531100 -1 ticks > > This results in two consecutive callout_stop() calls, but shouldn't hurt as > callout_stop is protected against that. > > Do you get a dump for this? Can you compare this pointer to the global > llinfo_nd6 and see if "c" from the softclock() frame is related (or maybe the > previous item in the list TAILQ). > Sorry I'm not very goot at debugging. Would you please give me some instructions (lamer's level, preferably :-)). And anyway I'll be able to do it tomorrow only. TIA, VladimirReceived on Wed Nov 02 2005 - 23:08:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:47 UTC