On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:51:33PM +0100, Jochen Gensch wrote: > Am Freitag 04 November 2005 22:27 schrieb Bernd Walter: > > > If you have the filesystem on a slice (e.g. da0s1) and not a partition > > (e.g. da0s1e) it shouldn't be an UFS one. > > I simply use the whole harddrive without subdividing partitions. Why souldn't > that slice be ufs? > > > > Then check with disklabel da0s1 what partitions you have and use the > > 4.2BSD ones. > > disklabel da0s1 > # /dev/da0s1: > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > c: 320159322 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't > edit > > > As you can see, nothing left. However I don't know what it looked like before. > I was able to mount da0s1 directly, so maybe there wasn't any partition > anyway since I used the entire disk at once (I'm not that used to filesystem > issues)? Well then da0s1 wouldn't have a disklabel. So try fsck_ufs -b 160 on /dev/da0s1 itself? -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green_at_FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\Received on Sat Nov 05 2005 - 00:46:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:47 UTC