On 2005-11-24 20:30, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie_at_le-hen.org> wrote: > > Is there any reason why we couldn't have LDADD honored in "buildworld" > > process? If there are no negative implications, I volunteer to do the > > work. I'd find it really useful. > > Yes, I'm curious, but could you explain in what way it would be useful ? I'd be interested too. I think the main reason why this would NOT be a good idea is that changing an external library to a newer version can break the buildworld/installworld process in unexpected waysReceived on Fri Nov 25 2005 - 02:49:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:48 UTC