Re: RELENG_6 Kernel doesn't build due to DEVFS

On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Andrew Lankford wrote:

> uname -a
>
> FreeBSD bogushost 6.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 #2: Mon Sep 12 23:01:45 EDT 
> 2005     root_at_bogushost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ARL6AMD64  amd64
>
> I haven't been able to build a GENERIC 6.0 kernel on amd64 for about a week
> now because of this error:

Make sure you buildworld before buildkernel, there was a compiler tweak, 
and the new compiler version is required to build the new kernel.

Robert N M Watson

>
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1148: warning: redundant redeclaration of 
> 'devfs_ops_f'
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:70: warning: previous declaration of 
> 'devfs_ops_f' was here
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1159: warning: redundant redeclaration of 
> 'devfs_vnodeops'
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:68: warning: previous declaration of 
> 'devfs_vnodeops' was here
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1181: warning: redundant redeclaration of 
> 'd
> evfs_specops'
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:69: warning: previous declaration of 
> 'devfs_specops' was here
> *** Error code 1
>
> For some reason, -Wall seems to be used when compiling this part of the 
> kernel even though I didn't specify this to make.conf.  As far as 
> devfs_vnops.c syntax goes, I've never used sparse declarations before, so I 
> wouldn't know if that's improper syntax or not.  Since no one else seems to 
> have complained about this, I'm wondering if I'm even following the right 
> branch anymore.  For the record here's the version info for the offending 
> source code:
>
> * $FreeBSD: src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c,v 1.114.2.5 2005/09/26 14:36:52 
> phk Exp $
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>