Benjamin Lutz wrote: >>>Sounds like the if_sk driver needs to be made more intelligent so that >>>it doesn't try to claim this card, yes? >>> >> >>Something like this... > > > Shouldn't this be applied to the re and maybe the nge driver as well > then? To prevent them from trying to attach to the other revisions? Yes, you are probably right. I realized this too, a few moments after I sent my previous mail. > The revision of the EG1032 that uses the Realtek chip is 0x10, according > to pciconf. (Full output for completeness' sake: > > re0_at_pci2:10:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00241737 chip=0x10321737 rev=0x10 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Linksys' > device = 'EG1032 Gigabit Ethernet' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > ) > I don't think we need to take nge into account since it only probes for NGE_VENDORID (0x100B) and NGE_DEVICEID (0x0022). rev 3 0x10, should be claimed by re rev 2(?) 0x12, should be claimed by sk rev 1(?), claimed by nge(4) FredrikReceived on Sun Oct 02 2005 - 10:27:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:44 UTC