Is rev the right thing to filter based on, or is the subvendor id and subvendor device? if a vendor sets the vendor id/vendor device fields wrong, who is to say that we can know based on the pci revision field if this device is right or not. The revision field tends to change a lot and having a sample size of 1 or 2 (or even 5) likely is insufficient to know if it can be relied upon to not cause problems with the next container load of the cards arrives... I know that the re vs rl decision is made based on the revision in the device's I/O space right now: while (t->rl_name != NULL) { if ((pci_get_vendor(dev) == t->rl_vid) && (pci_get_device(dev) == t->rl_did)) { ... map I/O hwrev = CSR_READ_4(sc, RL_TXCFG) & RL_TXCFG_HWREV; ... unmap I/O if (t->rl_basetype == hwrev) { device_set_desc(dev, t->rl_name); return (BUS_PROBE_DEFAULT); } } t++; } return (ENXIO); Checking for 0x10 vs 0x15 for a card that has gone from rev 2 to rev 3 just strikes me as unwise. WarnerReceived on Mon Oct 03 2005 - 17:28:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:44 UTC