On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:09:50AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:55:15PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:36:39PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:49:03PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > > +> Hi, > > > +> > > > +> I have found a repeatable panic with network device cloning, unfortunatly I am > > > +> unable to dump on this box. This is sparc64 with a 2 day old current. > > > > > > The order is wrong in vlan_modevent(). > > > > > > if_clone_detach() is freeing ifc_units field, so ifc_free_unit() should not > > > be called after that. > > > > > > This patch should fix the problem: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/if_vlan.c.patch > > > > Yes. This does introduce a race in that a new interface could > > be created between the vlan_clone_destroy loop and the call to > > if_clone_detach. > > I dont think this is the problem. IF_CLONE_REMREF(ifc) is freeing > ifc->ifc_units in if_clone_detach(). It look like the ref counting isnt > working quite right. FWIW, I tried to look at the $subject problem since I had had it before, but just got a different panic: Memory modified after free 0xc140b000(4092) val=deadc0dc _at_ 0xc140b000 panic: Most recently used by clone The clone code seems to have decremented something (refcount?) twice after freeing the memory chunk. -- YarReceived on Sun Oct 09 2005 - 21:29:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:45 UTC