On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:28:49AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:09:50AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:55:15PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:36:39PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:49:03PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > > > +> Hi, > > > > +> > > > > +> I have found a repeatable panic with network device cloning, unfortunatly I am > > > > +> unable to dump on this box. This is sparc64 with a 2 day old current. > > > > > > > > The order is wrong in vlan_modevent(). > > > > > > > > if_clone_detach() is freeing ifc_units field, so ifc_free_unit() should not > > > > be called after that. > > > > > > > > This patch should fix the problem: > > > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/if_vlan.c.patch > > > > > > Yes. This does introduce a race in that a new interface could > > > be created between the vlan_clone_destroy loop and the call to > > > if_clone_detach. > > > > I dont think this is the problem. IF_CLONE_REMREF(ifc) is freeing > > ifc->ifc_units in if_clone_detach(). It look like the ref counting isnt > > working quite right. > > FWIW, I tried to look at the $subject problem since I had had it > before, but just got a different panic: > > Memory modified after free 0xc140b000(4092) val=deadc0dc _at_ 0xc140b000 > panic: Most recently used by clone > > The clone code seems to have decremented something (refcount?) twice > after freeing the memory chunk. Yes, it still clears the interface bit in ifc_units in ifc_free_unit() after freeing the memory (for if_vlan and if_stf). I want to change the refcounting to count the number of cloned interfaces and have been playing with the code. The main problem is when a module is unloaded it doesnt use the if_clone* routines when destoying the interfaces in the simple_clone case. AndrewReceived on Sun Oct 09 2005 - 21:36:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:45 UTC