Ed, Have you done anything with this? I'm very interested in getting some real regression tests imported and this seems like a great place to start. Ideally, the test would be run several times: * archive with gnutar/extract with bsdtar * archive with cpio/extract with bsdtar * archive with bsdtar/extract with cpio * archive with bsdtar/extract with gnutar * etc... Unfortunately, the exact tests here will vary slightly: * gnutar can archive sparse files that bsdtar should correctly extract, but neither bsdtar nor cpio can archive sparse files * bsdtar can archive (and restore) very large directories and very deep directory trees. My testing of this has been somewhat hampered by limits in the rest of the system: /bin/sh won't cd to a dir whose path is longer than about 8k, rm/find/ls/du are all limited to 32k path lengths, etc. I suspect the ideal test arrangement would provide switches to the comparison routine to omit/ignore certain files. Then you could build a single "original", make several copies using the above combinations, then compare while overlooking any unsupported attributes. Thoughts? Tim Ed Maste wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 05:43:09PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >>Can we import the tar stress tests as a regression test? i.e. what is >>the license on them? > > > Right now the only mention of any copyright info is > # Copyright 2003, Elizabeth D. Zwicky > in one of the files. > > The author states > The test programs were written in a spirit of experimentation, > rather than with the intention of producing software for other > people to use. I strongly encourage people who are interested > in testing backup and archive programs to produce their own > tests that cover the cases they are most interested in. However, > if you insist on using my programs, or just want to snicker at > my programming, they are available from > http://www.greatcircle.com/~zwicky > > Despite that, I think they've already demonstrated their value. > > The stress test consists of two perl programs. One creates a test tree, > and the other compares file metadata between the original tree and a > restored tree. An automated method for running the test and comparing > the results is not included (but would be easy to write, of course). > > I'll contact the author to ask about the license. > > -- > Ed Maste, Sandvine Incorporated > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > >Received on Mon Oct 10 2005 - 22:38:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:45 UTC