Re: Small typo in /usr/share/examples/make.conf

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, 09:58+0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:

> On Sun, 23.10.2005 at 23:38:34 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > > Sorry if this is the wrong mailing list to inform... I
> > > just noticed that in /usr/share/examples/make.conf
> > > Radius support option is written as PPP_NO_RADUIS
> > > instead of PPP_NO_RADIUS . I guess it's just a typo
> > > and RADIUS is the option which gets parsed.
> >
> > Fixed.  Thanks!
>
> While you're at it ...
>
> I was going mad when trying to get a devfs.rules file working and
> noticed the following typo in rc.subr
>
>
> --- /etc/rc.subr	Sun Oct 23 11:23:59 2005
> +++ /etc/rc.subr.new	Mon Oct 24 09:53:17 2005
> _at__at_ -1184,7 +1184,7 _at__at_
>  }
>
>  # devfs_set_ruleset ruleset [dir]
> -#	Sets the default ruleset of dir to ruleset. The ruleset arguement
> +#	Sets the default ruleset of dir to ruleset. The ruleset argument
>  #	must be a ruleset name as specified in devfs.rules(5) file.
>  #	Returns non-zero if it could not set it successfully.
>  #

Being non-native speaker I am not sure this is a error.  There are
about a dozen "arguement"s in our src tree and google gives 2.8
millions.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov