On 2005-10-24 12:11, Maxim Konovalov <maxim_at_macomnet.ru> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, 09:58+0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > > While you're at it ... > > > > I was going mad when trying to get a devfs.rules file working and > > noticed the following typo in rc.subr > > > > --- /etc/rc.subr Sun Oct 23 11:23:59 2005 > > +++ /etc/rc.subr.new Mon Oct 24 09:53:17 2005 > > _at__at_ -1184,7 +1184,7 _at__at_ > > } > > > > # devfs_set_ruleset ruleset [dir] > > -# Sets the default ruleset of dir to ruleset. The ruleset arguement > > +# Sets the default ruleset of dir to ruleset. The ruleset argument > > # must be a ruleset name as specified in devfs.rules(5) file. > > # Returns non-zero if it could not set it successfully. > > # > > Being non-native speaker I am not sure this is a error. There are > about a dozen "arguement"s in our src tree and google gives 2.8 > millions. It's definitely a typo.Received on Mon Oct 24 2005 - 22:04:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:46 UTC