Joao Barros <joao.barros_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/25/05, Robert Atkinson <phreaki_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> Maybe a longshot, but what is your cluster size? > The default block size of 16384 bytes, a fragment size of 2048 bytes > The ide drive has a NTFS partition which I mounted readonly and > copying files from there resulted with the same below expected > performance :( I haven't read the entire thread, but by looking at this I assume there's another FS than NTFS involved. Benchmarking with NTFS (or MSDOSFS) as the underlying FS doesn't make sense (unless you want to measure the performance of NTFS or MSDOSFS), since it's slow (for NTFS you should be happy to at least be able to read something, there's no open documentation about it available). So I suggest you try with a good FS (ufs 1 or 2) only and don't bother about NTFS, to make sure the FS isn't the bottleneck. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild _at_ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 The Supreme Court does it with all deliberate speed.Received on Wed Oct 26 2005 - 12:38:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:46 UTC