Am Freitag 02 September 2005 18:49 schrieben Sie: > > SU NB /:route -n flush -inet > > default 10.0.0.1 done > > 10.0.0.104 127.0.0.1 done > > [REMOVED network cable from fxp0] > > [Pluged in wireless nic ath0] > > SU NB /:ping i-mc.de > > PING i-mc.de (213.203.199.12): 56 data bytes > > ping: sendto: No route to host > > ^C > > --- i-mc.de ping statistics --- > > 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > [OK, routes have not been corrected yet] > > SU NB /:route add default 10.0.0.1 > > route: writing to routing socket: File exists > > add net default: gateway 10.0.0.1: File exists > > [Why does that route sitll exist, it has been deleted above] > > SU NB /:ping i-mc.de > > ^C > > SU NB /:route delete default > > delete net default > > SU NB /:route add default 10.0.0.1 > > add net default: gateway 10.0.0.1 > > SU NB /:ping i-mc.de > > ^C > > > > I cannot set the routes to ath0 once fxp0 was active. I guess I must > > still be misunderstandung what you guys are saying / doing. > I need to see the IPv4 routing table before and after each step to > understand what's going. Please send the results of "netstat -rnf inet" > at each stage. Also, please, please, please, ping by IP address so > we're not testing your resolver (which is dependent on your routing > configuration.) Sorry for getting back that late, wasn't home. Ok, here we got: System freshly booted, no wireless nic pluged in -> System runs on internal fxp0. netstat -r ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default UGS 0 5333 fxp0 10/24 link#2 UC 0 0 fxp0 00:30:f1:e1:4b:4e UHLW 2 1224 fxp0 718 10.0.0.104 localhost UGHS 0 0 lo0 localhost localhost UH 1 22 lo0 ping 213.203.199.12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ping 213.203.199.12 PING 213.203.199.12 (213.203.199.12): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 213.203.199.12: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=25.936 ms 64 bytes from 213.203.199.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=25.890 ms 64 bytes from 213.203.199.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=25.771 ms ^C --- 213.203.199.12 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 25.771/25.866/25.936/0.070 ms Unplugging network cable from fxp0 Doing a "route -n flush -inet " to get rid off default routes etc. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- route -n flush -inet default 10.0.0.1 done 10.0.0.104 127.0.0.1 done netstart -r ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire 10/24 link#2 UC 0 0 fxp0 10.0.0.1 00:30:f1:e1:4b:4e UHLW 1 1287 fxp0 182 localhost localhost UH 0 22 lo0 Pluging in wireless nic ath0 (No start_if.X scripts in etc) netstat -r ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 10.0.0.1 UGS 0 0 fxp0 10/24 link#2 UC 0 0 fxp0 10.0.0.1 link#2 UHRLW 2 1383 fxp0 8 10.0.0.103 localhost UGHS 0 0 lo0 localhost localhost UH 1 22 lo0 As you can see, the default route is back on fxp0, even though I deleted it before and there is no cable attached. ping 213.203.199.12 (obvious result) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ping 213.203.199.12 PING 213.203.199.12 (213.203.199.12): 56 data bytes ^C --- 213.203.199.12 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss Trying something else ------------------------------------------------------------- ifconfig fxp0 down SU NB ~:route delete default delete net default SU NB ~:route add default 10.0.0.1 add net default: gateway 10.0.0.1 SU NB ~:netstat -r Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default UGS 0 0 fxp0 10/24 link#5 UC 0 0 ath0 00:30:f1:e1:4b:4e UHLW 2 9 ath0 1171 10.0.0.103 localhost UGHS 0 0 lo0 localhost localhost UH 1 22 lo0 I cannot kill the default route on fxp0. However the kernel is complaing about arp things, which I don't understand. The ath0 and fxp0 card share the same subnet, since I cannot set up two different ones in my hardware router. But that shouldn't be the problem since fxp0 shouldn't be active anyway... here is the kernel output for the above procedure: Sep 7 20:52:38 incmc kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN Sep 7 21:09:48 incmc kernel: ath0: <Atheros 5212> mem 0xc0210000-0xc021ffff irq 9 at device 0.0 on cardbus0 Sep 7 21:09:48 incmc kernel: ath0: Ethernet address: 00:05:5d:9f:c5:0e Sep 7 21:09:48 incmc kernel: ath0: mac 5.9 phy 4.3 radio 3.6 Sep 7 21:09:55 incmc kernel: ath0: link state changed to UP Sep 7 21:10:13 incmc kernel: arp: 10.0.0.1 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:30:f1:e1:4b:4e on ath0 Sep 7 21:10:16 incmc last message repeated 7 times Sep 7 21:10:16 incmc dhclient: New IP Address (ath0): 10.0.0.103 Sep 7 21:10:16 incmc dhclient: New Subnet Mask (ath0): 255.255.255.0 Sep 7 21:10:16 incmc dhclient: New Broadcast Address (ath0): 10.0.0.255 Sep 7 21:10:16 incmc dhclient: New Routers (ath0): 10.0.0.1 Sep 7 21:14:48 incmc kernel: arp: 10.0.0.1 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:30:f1:e1:4b:4e on ath0 Sep 7 21:20:27 incmc dhclient[204]: connection closed Sep 7 21:20:27 incmc dhclient[204]: exiting. JochenReceived on Wed Sep 07 2005 - 17:29:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:43 UTC