On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:49:09PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 18:17:24 -0400, Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org> said: > > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:05:48AM +0300, McLone wrote: > > >> This is very sad. Even oldish Plan 9 always had union mounts. > >> Where is the problem? VFS? Locking? Lack of interest? > > > The first 2, among other problems. > > union mounts work just fine. It's unionfs that doesn't work. It's > trying to do something much more complicated. I don't know which one > Plan 9 has. Right, thanks for clarifying. Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:43 UTC