Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:40:06PM -0700, Jon Dama wrote: > >> >>>>And whenever there is a wireless network available (where the system can log >>>>in an get a network connection) the default route should be switched to that >>>>wireless nic. Or even better, if both connections work, automatically choose >>>>the faster one :-). >>> >>>That's the goal we're headed towards. Unfortunatly, it's not an instant >>>thing, particularly when people trying things like what you're doing >>>that don't map well into the old world view of static devices that don't >>>change networks. The old model is wrong and has been so for quite some >>>time, but that doesn't mean there aren't assumptions related to it all >>>over the place. >> >>Again, the problem is with the routing code. You should NOT need to be >>deleting default routes simply because one link goes down and another >>comes up on a different interface. >> >>Deleting the route simply because the interface went down is a hack. > > Got a new routing implemention handy? Until then, well have to live > with hacks. :( It's on my TODO list for my funded time. I've postponed work until FreeBSD 6.0R is out though. -- AndreReceived on Fri Sep 09 2005 - 07:04:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:43 UTC