Re: Negative disc usage from /bin/df 6.0-BETA5

From: Julian H. Stacey <jhs_at_flat.berklix.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:42:04 +0200
--------
Kris Kennaway wrote:
	(& similar private mail from Rene L. thanks to both)

> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:21:50PM +0200, Julian Stacey wrote:
> > 6.0-BETA5 /bin/df
> > 	Filesystem        1K-blocks     Used   Avail Capacity  Mounted on
> > 	/dev/ad0s4a          253678    91884  141500    39%    /
> > 	devfs                     1        1       0   100%    /dev
> > 	/dev/ad0s4d          253678   141418   91966    61%    /var
> > 	/dev/ad0s4e          253678     -272  233656    -0%    /tmp
> > 	/dev/ad0s4f         5421722  3255960 1732026    65%    /usr
> >=20
> > 108% is plausible when eg root has eaten most of the reserve allowed by=
> =20
> > eg 'newfs -m 10', but ...  Negative disc usage just doesnt look right !
> 
> umount and fsck..you probably have some fs corruption.

Yes, thanks,
	FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK 	 SALVAGE? yes
First I was just so amused to see negative space used (& had wondered
about ratio of int to unsigned usage in the FS etc).

-- 
Julian Stacey.  Consultant Unix Net & Sys. Eng., Munich.  http://berklix.com
Mail Ascii not HTML.          Ihr Rauch = meine allergischen Kopfschmerzen.
Received on Tue Sep 27 2005 - 18:42:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:44 UTC