On 2006-04-27 14:42, Jiawei Ye <leafy7382_at_gmail.com> wrote: > leafy_at_chihiro:~$ top > top: sysctl(kern.ccpu...) failed: No such file or directory > > -current as of 4 hrs ago. The following change renames `kern.ccpu' to `kern.sched.ccpu', but it is kind of incomplete, IMHO. # Index: src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c # =================================================================== # --- src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c (revision 19) # +++ src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c (working copy) # _at__at_ -31,11 +31,11 _at__at_ # * OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF # * SUCH DAMAGE. # */ # # #include <sys/cdefs.h> # -__FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c,v 1.78 2006/04/17 18:20:37 jhb Exp $"); # +__FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c,v 1.79 2006/04/26 19:42:38 jmg Exp $"); # # #include "opt_hwpmc_hooks.h" # # #define kse td_sched # # _at__at_ -404,11 +404,11 _at__at_ # #define loadfactor(loadav) (2 * (loadav)) # #define decay_cpu(loadfac, cpu) (((loadfac) * (cpu)) / ((loadfac) + FSCALE)) # # /* decay 95% of `ke_pctcpu' in 60 seconds; see CCPU_SHIFT before changing */ # static fixpt_t ccpu = 0.95122942450071400909 * FSCALE; /* exp(-1/20) */ # -SYSCTL_INT(_kern, OID_AUTO, ccpu, CTLFLAG_RD, &ccpu, 0, ""); # +SYSCTL_INT(_kern_sched, OID_AUTO, ccpu, CTLFLAG_RD, &ccpu, 0, ""); # # /* # * If `ccpu' is not equal to `exp(-1/20)' and you still want to use the # * faster/more-accurate formula, you'll have to estimate CCPU_SHIFT below # * and possibly adjust FSHIFT in "param.h" so that (FSHIFT >= CCPU_SHIFT). The main problems with this change are: 1) It doesn't update consumers of the kern.ccpu sysctl that we already have in the tree (i.e. top(1) which you saw breaking). 2) It doesn't update the `kern.ccpu' sysctl in the sched_ule.c scheduler, so it creates an inconsistency between different FreeBSD scheduling systems. I believe John-Mark can fix this easily, so I've copied him in this message. In the mean time, you can revert sched_4bsd.c to revision 1.78 and try to see if this fixes the problems top(1) is having. - Giorgos
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:55 UTC