Re: suggested addition to 'date'

From: Aleksey Perov <algardo_at_sura.ru>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:53:12 +0400
Julian Elischer wrote:

> Aleksey Perov wrote:
> 
> >Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>At various times I've wanted to add timestamps to logfiles as they are 
> >>generated..
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >This wheel has been invented million years ago.
> >
> >Install DJB's daemontools from ports, then run
> >
.....
> >
> I can not install ports onto these machines. They are appliances.
> 
> I will simply put the unhancement in out own cvs tree, and the 
> enhancement will be private.
> I'm still comletely amazed that no-one but me thinks this is a good idea 
> as it seems absolutly
> obvious to me  and it doesn't affect date's usual behaviour in the 
> slightest.

Actually I don't object but rather agree that adding such an option to date is
a good idea, no matter which letter it would be - "s" or "S" or "p" or "_at_". As
for my previous posting, I just suggested one of many possible solutions, like
others in this thread did.



-- 
Aleksey Perov
Received on Thu Aug 17 2006 - 02:53:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC