Divacky Roman wrote: >>Anyone with interest in this is free to take care of this, as long as >>they coordinate with the people which work on the current >>infrastructure on emulation_at_ regarding the userland/security stuff and >>the kernel. Until someone stands up and shows results/progress, this >>is scheduled to vanish in the future. >> >> > > >I personally see this 3 possible ways: > >1) leave it as it is (ie. as what will be commited shortly), this means runtime >checking for osrelease sysctl and behaving according to it > >2) introduce option LINUX_24 or something like that to make this a compile time build > >3) remove the 2.4 completely saying that "if you want 2.4 emulation downgrade fbsd as well". >notice that this is 100% ok because linux itself doesnt support 2.4 emulation on 2.6 kernel. > > I think that would be a great selling point.. especially if two processes could run the different releases at the same time.. "even linux needs vmware to do this..". >I would go with number 3. > >roman > >Received on Thu Aug 17 2006 - 13:15:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC