Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC)

"Michael Bushkov" <bushman_at_rsu.ru> writes:
> Li Xin wrote:
> > Would you please consider having the imported OpenLDAP to install
> > shared objects under alternative names? It might be painful for
> > users who wants OpenLDAP installation from the ports collection
> > (as OpenLDAP team moves fast and fixes bug from time to time) if
> > they get a same library in /usr/lib...
> I've been thinking about that. Would names like "libldap_i.so" and
> "liblber_i.so" be ok ("_i" means "imported", or "internal")?

Please don't.  If somebody isn't happy with the base system's libldap,
they can add WITHOUT_LDAP to their make.conf.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no