Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC)

From: Xin LI <delphij_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:30:56 +0800
On 8/22/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no> wrote:
> "Michael Bushkov" <bushman_at_rsu.ru> writes:
> > Li Xin wrote:
> > > Would you please consider having the imported OpenLDAP to install
> > > shared objects under alternative names? It might be painful for
> > > users who wants OpenLDAP installation from the ports collection
> > > (as OpenLDAP team moves fast and fixes bug from time to time) if
> > > they get a same library in /usr/lib...
> > I've been thinking about that. Would names like "libldap_i.so" and
> > "liblber_i.so" be ok ("_i" means "imported", or "internal")?
>
> Please don't.  If somebody isn't happy with the base system's libldap,
> they can add WITHOUT_LDAP to their make.conf.

Fair to me.  I think this is a better solution for the issue.

Cheers,
-- 
Xin LI <delphij_at_delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net
Received on Tue Aug 22 2006 - 14:30:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC