On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:49:53AM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 15:46 +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > > > it seems like very trivial so expect patch today ;) > > > > www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/statfs64.patch > > > > pls tell me if this works, thnx > > The patch applied and built on i386. However, when I run the resultant > kernel, the problem of the "syscall statfs64 not implemented" messages > goes away but my Tivoli backup still fails (in a different way). (The > same Tivoli client and setup worked on i386 -CURRENT prior to > mid-August, and currently is working on an i386 6.1-STABLE system.) > > Now, when the scheduled backup runs, I get things like this in my > dsmerror.log: > > 08/23/06 02:58:37 TransErrno: Unexpected error from GetFSInfo:statfs, errno = 14 > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1228E Sending of object '/backup' failed > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1063E The specified path is not a valid file system or logical volume name. > > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1228E Sending of object '/backup/var' failed > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1063E The specified path is not a valid file system or logical volume name. > > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1228E Sending of object '/backup/usr' failed > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1063E The specified path is not a valid file system or logical volume name. > > 08/23/06 02:58:40 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'DESKTOP_DAILY_BACKUP' failed. Return code = 12. > > > I don't know if this indicates that there is a problem with the > implementation of statfs64/statfs, now. (I don't know if it complicates > matters, but I'm backing up mounted snapshots.) pls, can you build -DDEBUG version of linuxolator and show me what it prints?Received on Wed Aug 23 2006 - 15:47:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC