On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:14:44PM +0800, Intron is my alias on the Internet wrote: > 1. Many options of clone(2) are not correctly implemented, some of > which may cause application crash when it wants to clone > memory-independent process. like? > 2. TLS (Thread Local Storage) support in clone(2), set_thread_area(2) > and get_thread_area(2) doesn't conform to Linux 2.6.x, which can > damage stack of Linux application using NPTL (Native POSIX Threads > Library). > > Of course, to obtain the conformation, FreeBSD native GDT must be > rearranged. But Linux NPTL is quite essential for modern Linux > applications. what do you mean that doesnt conform? TLS in linux is implemented using GDT. the only difference between fbsd and linux I can think of is that linux supports 3 gdt entries while fbsd just one. > 3. wakeup_one(9) instead of wakeup(9) should be used for futex(2) to > wake up a single sleeping thread. yes... I agree > 4. Some options of clock_gettime(2) actually can be implemented, though > FreeBSD native implementation is different from Linux's. I might look at it > 5. Code style problems: member naming of structure, macro naming, > function naming, encapsulation for queue(3) and so on. in my code or in the imported code? > In a word, may ORACLE 10g for Linux be able to run under FreeBSD soon. nice :)Received on Fri Aug 25 2006 - 16:10:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC