On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:04:47 -0700, Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:50:22PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > > Incidentally, I've been wondering for the longest time now: is/are > > there any particular reason(s) why we exclude gcj from the gcc > > tree/build? Sure would be a cool thing to have. > > > > 1) It's not needed to build anything in the base system. > 2) It takes a long time to build. > 3) You really want to use the gcc41 or gcc42 port. > > Of course, IMHO. I've tried both ports, but gcj fails to run, complaining about a missing "spec" file (I forget the exact filename, maybe "gcjlib.spec" or something similar). :-( Is this maybe an arch-specific (amd64) problem? Or? -- Conrad J. Sabatier <conrads_at_cox.net> -- "In Unix veritas"Received on Tue Aug 29 2006 - 23:29:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC